DRM Watch
 The Leading Resource For Digital Rights Management
  Earthweb  
Events Jobs Premium Services Media Kit Network Map E-mail Offers Vendor Solutions Webcasts

Navigate DRMWatch.com:
IT Management Webcasts:
The Role of Security in IT Service Management

Preparing for an IT Audit

More Webcasts


Search EarthWeb Network

Marketplace Partners
Be a Marketplace Partner

internet.commerce
Be a Commerce Partner














DRM Watch : Legal Issues: SonyBMG Settles CD Copy Protection Cases

SonyBMG Settles CD Copy Protection Cases
December 20, 2006
By Bill Rosenblatt

SonyBMG Music has settled lawsuits brought by the states of Texas and California over its use of CD copy protection technology in 2005.  This is the second settlement of litigation related to the so-called rootkit fiasco; the first, a settlement of a class-action civil suit, was approved several months ago.

The settlement of the Texas and California litigation involves fines and agreements to reimburse consumers for discs and compensate them for damages to their PCs.  Beyond that, it appears to place restrictions on the copy protection technologies that the music company will be allowed to use which go beyond those stipulated in the class-action settlement. 

The previous settlement essentially forbade SonyBMG from using any CD copy protection technology from First4Internet, the UK-based vendor that supplied the XCP technology that installed "rootkits" in users' PCs.  (First4Internet appears to have gone out of business.)  It also barred SonyBMG from using another copy protection technology, MediaMax from Phoenix-based SunnComm, but the prohibition was apparently confined to the current version of MediaMax, thereby allowing SunnComm to develop another version that the record company could use.  The class-action suit accused the SunnComm technology of, among other things, violating users' privacy by transmitting information about music usage over the Internet.

This new settlement calls for any CD copy protection technologies that SonyBMG uses in the future to not be hidden on users' PCs.  This is a reasonable requirement, though it is yet another reason why CD copy protection is a technology of little value.  A technology that controls access to content is of no use if it can be uninstalled from PCs, or if users can avoid installing it in the first place.  Making the technology be more "visible" on PCs should only make it easier to uninstall.

Meanwhile, the third vendor of CD copy protection, Macrovision, has quietly withdrawn its technology from the market after its one major US customer, EMI, stopped using it. 

The attorneys general in Texas and California touted SonyBMG's degree of cooperation in stopping its use of these technologies.  We continue to believe that the root cause of this debacle lays somewhere between ill-informed decision-making processes at SonyBMG and overpromises from the vendors.  CD copy protection for PCs, in any of its current forms, gives DRM a bad name.

 

Get DRM Watch Newsletter
Click here to subscribe to DRM Watch

Tools:
Add www.drmwatch.com to your favorites
Add www.drmwatch.com to your browser search box
IE 7 | Firefox 2.0 | Firefox 1.5.x
Receive news via our XML/RSS feed

Legal Issues Archives